<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>275 GTB on Automobilist.org</title>
    <link>https://automobilist.org/tags/275-gtb/</link>
    <description>Recent content in 275 GTB on Automobilist.org</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://automobilist.org/tags/275-gtb/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The Ferrari 275 GTB Is the Ferrari That Enthusiasts Argue About and the Market Has Already Decided</title>
      <link>https://automobilist.org/2025/11/24/the-ferrari-275-gtb-is-the-ferrari-that-enthusiasts-argue-about-and-the-market-has-already-decided/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://automobilist.org/2025/11/24/the-ferrari-275-gtb-is-the-ferrari-that-enthusiasts-argue-about-and-the-market-has-already-decided/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The debate between 275 GTB purists — those who insist the long-nose, alloy-bodied, six-carburettor 275 GTB/4 is the definitive expression — and those who prefer the earlier short-nose car&amp;rsquo;s proportions has the quality of all good automotive arguments: it is about something real, it produces no consensus, and both sides have valid points that the other side acknowledges while refusing to concede. The market has taken a position by valuing the /4 variant substantially above the earlier car, but market valuations reflect consensus rather than correctness.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
