<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Roadster on Automobilist.org</title>
    <link>https://automobilist.org/tags/roadster/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Roadster on Automobilist.org</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://automobilist.org/tags/roadster/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Red, Loud, and Unapologetically Fake: The Neo-Classic Roadster as Rolling Philosophy</title>
      <link>https://automobilist.org/red-loud-and-unapologetically-fake-the-neo-classic-roadster-as-rolling-philosophy/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://automobilist.org/red-loud-and-unapologetically-fake-the-neo-classic-roadster-as-rolling-philosophy/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;There is a particular kind of car that makes no apologies for what it is. Not a survivor. Not a restoration. Not an original anything. It is a deliberate fiction — a vehicle engineered to look like the 1930s while being manufactured decades later, powered by something far more reliable than whatever supercharged straight-six would have powered the real thing. The neo-classic roadster has always occupied this odd, unembarrassed niche, and the red car photographed on a winding Mediterranean road — rally plate number 28 affixed to its door, two passengers leaning into a sun-drenched corner — belongs squarely to that tradition.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
